Numéro CAS : 104-55-2

  • Fiche complète
  • PMSD
  • SIMDUT
  • Résumé

Identification

Description


Formule moléculaire brute : C9H8O

Principaux synonymes

Noms français :

  • 2-PROPENAL, 3-PHENYL-
  • 2-PROPENAL,3-PHENYL-
  • 3-PHENYL 2-PROPENAL
  • 3-PHENYL 2-PROPENALDEHYDE
  • 3-PHENYL ACROLEIN
  • 3-PHENYL PROPENAL
  • 3-PHENYL-2-PROPENAL
  • 3-PHENYL-2-PROPENALDEHYDE
  • 3-PHENYLACROLEIN
  • 3-PHENYLPROPENAL
  • Aldéhyde cinnamique
  • BENZYLIDENEACETALDEHYDE
  • BETA-PHENYLACROLEIN
  • Cinnamaldéhyde
  • PHENYL-3 PROPEN-2 AL-1
  • PHENYL-3 PROPENAL
  • PHENYL-3 PROPENAL-2
  • PHENYL-3 PROPENALDEHYDE-2
  • PHENYLACROLEIN

Noms anglais :

  • CASSIA ALDEHYDE
  • CINNAMAL
  • Cinnamaldehyde
  • Cinnamic aldehyde
  • CINNAMYL ALDEHYDE
Utilisation et sources d'émission

Agent de saveur, fabrication de parfums

Références

  • ▲1.  van Joost, T., Stolz, E. et Van der Hoek, J.C.S., «Simultaneous allergy to perfume ingredients.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 12, no. 2, p. 115-116. (1985). [AP-023927]
  • ▲2.  Larsen, W.G., «Perfume dermatitis - a study of 20 patients.» Archives of Dermatology. Vol. 113, p. 623-626. (1977). [AP-024193]
  • ▲3.  Gad, S.C. et al., «Development and validation of an alternative dermal sensitization test : the mouse er swelling test (MEST).» Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. Vol. 84, p. 93-114. (1986). [AP-019707 ]
  • ▲4.  Bickers, D. et al., «A toxicologic and dermatologic assessment of cinnamyl alcohol, cinnamaldehyde and cinnamic acid when used as fragance ingredients.» Food and Chemical Toxicology. Vol. 43, no. 6, p. 799-836. (2005).
  • ▲5.  Cocchiara, J. et al., «Fragrance material review on cinnamaldehyde.» Food and Chemical Toxicology. Vol. 43, no. 6, p. 867-923. (2005).
  • ▲6.  Gonçalo, S., Cabral, F. et Gonçalo, M., «Contact sensitivity to oak moss.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 19, p. 355-357. (1988).
  • ▲7.  Buckley, D.A. et al., «Fragrance as an occupational allergen.» Occupational Medicine. Vol. 52, no. 1, p. 13-16. (2002). [AP-062109]
  • ▲8.  Schubert, H.J., «Skin diseases in workers at a perfume factory.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 55, p. 81-83. (2006).
  • ▲9.  Becker, K., Temesvari, E. et Nemeth, I., «Patch testing with fragrance mix and its constituents in Hungarian population.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 30, p. 185-186. (1994).
  • ▲10.  Larsen, W.G., «Perfume dermatitis.» Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Vol. 12, no. 1, part 1, p. 1-9. (1985). [AP-024810]
  • ▲11.  Meding, B., «Skin symptoms among workers in a spice factory.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 29, p. 202-205. (1993).
  • ▲12.  Seite-Bellezza, D., el Sayed, F. et Bazex, J., «Contact urticaria from cinnamic aldehyde and benzaldehyde in a confectioner.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 31, p. 272-273. (1994).
  • ▲13.  Nixon, R., «Cinnamon allergy in a baker.» Australasian Journal of Dermatology. Vol. 36, p. 41. (1995). [AP-050995]
  • ▲14.  Weibel, H., Hansen, J. et Andersen, K. E., «Cross-sensitization patterns in guinea pigs between cinnamaldehyde, cinnamyl alcohol and cinnamic acid.» Acta Dermato-Venereologica. Vol. 69, p. 302-307. (1989). [AP-026807]
  • ▲15.  Buckley, D.A. et al., «The frequency of fragrance allergy in a patch-test population over a 17-year period.» The British Journal of Dermatology. Vol. 142, no. 2, p. 279-283. (2000).
  • ▲16.  Senma, M. et al., «Studies on the cutaneous sensitization reaction of guinea pigs to purified aromatic chemicals.» Acta Dermato-Venereologica. Vol. 58, no. 2, p. 121-124. (1978).

La cote entre [ ] provient de la banque Information SST du Centre de documentation de la CNESST.