The section entitled For a Maternity Experience program is not available in English for this substance. Consult the French version.

Programme pour une maternité sans danger (PMSD)

Propriétés physiques pertinentes 1

Mise à jour : 2020-01-30

Voies d'absorption

L'information relative à cette section n'est pas disponible actuellement.

Effets sur le développement

L'information relative à cette section n'est pas disponible actuellement

Effets sur la reproduction

L'information relative à cette section n'est pas disponible actuellement

Effets sur l'allaitement

L'information relative à cette section n'est pas disponible actuellement

Cancérogénicité 2 3 4 5 6

Mise à jour : 2012-02-16

Évaluation de la cancérogénicité par des organismes officiels

Le Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (CIRC, 2012) considère que les composés de nickel sont cancérogènes pour l'homme (groupe 1).

L'ACGIH (2001) considère que les composés de nickel inorganiques solubles sont non classifiables comme cancérogène pour l'homme (groupe A4).

Le NTP (2016) considère les composés de nickel comme étant des cancérogènes reconnus chez l'humain (K).

Mutagénicité

L'information relative à cette section n'est pas disponible actuellement.

Références

• ▲1.  O'Neil, M.J. et al., The Merck Index : an encyclopedia of chemicals, drugs, & biologicals. 15e éd. Cambridge, G.-B. : Royal Society of Chemistry. (2013). [RM-403001]   https://www.rsc.org/Merck-Index/
• ▲2.  IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Chromium, nickel and welding. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, Vol. 49. Lyon : International Agency for Research on Cancer. (1990).   https://monographs.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/mono49.pdf
  http://www.iarc.fr
• ▲3.  IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, A Review of Human Carcinogens: Arsenic, Metals, Fibres, and Dusts. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, Vol. 100C. Lyon : International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2012).   http://monographs.iarc.fr/
  http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol100C/mono100C.pdf
  
• ▲4.  American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, TLVs® and BEIs® : threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati (OH) : ACGIH. (2024). [NO-003164]   http://www.acgih.org
• ▲5.  Report on Carcinogens, 15th edition. Research Triangle Park, NC : U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. (2021).   https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/pubhealth/roc/index-1.html
• ▲6.  American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, «Nickel and inorganic compounds, including nickel subsulfide.» In: Documentation of the threshold limit values and biological exposure indices / Documentation of TLV's and BEI's. Cincinnati, Ohio : ACGIH. (2001). Publication #0100Doc.   http://www.acgih.org

Autres sources d'information

• Weiss, G., Hazardous Chemicals Data Book. 2nd ed. Park Ridge, N.J. : Noyes Data Corporation. (1986). [RR-015005]
• Lide, D.R. , CRC handbook of chemistry and physics. 73rd ed. Boca Raton, Fla : CRC Press. (1992).
• Mark, H.F., Grayson, M. et Eckroth, D., Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology. 3rd ed. New York : Wiley. (1978-84). [RT-423004]
• Patty, F.A., Patty's industrial hygiene and toxicology. Vol. 2, 3rd ed. New York : John Wiley & Son. (1978).
• Sax, N.I., Dangerous properties of industrial materials. 7th ed. Toronto : Van Nostrand Reinhold. (1989). [RR-014005]
• Lauwerys, R.R., Toxicologie industrielle et intoxications professionnelles. 3e éd. Paris : Masson. (1990). [MO-001959]
• Motolese, A. et al., «Contact dermatitis and contact sensitization among enamellers and decorators in the ceramics industry.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 28, no. 2, p. 59-62. (1993). [AP-053377]
• Mitchell, J.C., «Type I without type III and type IV hypersensitivity reaction to nickel.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 7, no. 5, p. 270. (1981).
• Basketter, D.A. et al., «Nickel, cobalt and chromium in consumer products : a role in allergic contact dermatitis.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 28, p. 15-25. (1993).
• Gaddoni, G. et al., «Contact dermatitis among decorators and enamellers in hand-made ceramic decorations.» Contact dermatitis. Vol. 28, p. 127-128. (1993).
• Schubert, H.J., «Nickel dermatitis in medical workers.» Dermatologic Clinics. Vol. 8, no. 1, p. 45-47. (1990).
• Schubert, H. et al., «Epidemiology of nickel allergy.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 16, p. 122-128. (1987). [AP-015022]
• Peltonen, L., «Nickel Sensitivity in the general population.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 5, p. 27-32. (1979).
• Hutchinson, F., Raffle, E.J. et Macleod, T.M., «The specificity of lymphocyte transformation in vitro by nickel salts in nickel sensitive subjects.» Journal of Investigative Dermatology. Vol. 58, no. 6, p. 362-365. (1972).
• Fisher, A.A., «Allergic contact dermatitis from musical instruments.» Cutis. Vol. 51, no. 2, p. 75-76. (1993).
• Shah, M., Lewis, F.M. et Gawkrodger, D.J., «Nickel as an occupational allergen : a survey of 368 nickel-sensitive subjects.» Archives of Dermatology. Vol. 134, no. 10, p. 1231-1236. (1998).
• France. Institut national de recherche et de sécurité, Fiche toxicologique no 68 : Nickel et ses oxydes. Cahiers de notes documentaires. Paris : INRS. (2009). [RE-005509]   http://www.inrs.fr/publications/bdd/fichetox.html
  http://www.inrs.fr/publications/bdd/fichetox/fiche.html?refINRS=FICHETOX_68
• Seidenari, S. et al., «Contact sensitization among ceramics workers.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 22, p. 45-49. (1990). [AP-032990]
• Fregert, S., «Occupational dermatitis in a 10 year material.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 1, p. 96-107. (1975).
• Gimenez-Camarasa, J.M. et al., «Lymphocyte transformation test in allergic contact nickel dermatitis.» British Journal of Dermatology. Vol. 92, p. 9-15. (1975).
• Hoey, M.J. , «The effects of metallic salts on the histology and functioning of the rat testis.» Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. Vol. 12, p. 461-471. (1966). [AP-021502]
• TOXICOLOGY, VOL.57, 1989, P.255-266 [AP-139368]
• Contact Dermatitis, VOL. 14, 1986, P.158-161 [AP-040221]
• BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, VOL.17, 1977, P.241-247 [AP-016645]
• Singgih, S.I.R. et al., «Occupational hand dermatoses in hospital cleaning personnel.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 14, p. 14-19. (1986). [AP-011608]
• van der Burg, C.K.H. et al., «Hand eczema in hairdressers and nurses: a prospective study. 1. Evaluation of atopy and nickel hypersensitivity at the start of apprenticeship.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 14, p. 275-279. (1986). [AP-013632]
• CONTACT DERMATITIS, VOL.15, 1986, P.169-172 [AP-018922]
• AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, VOL.14, 1988, 257-266 [AP-037170]
• JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONENTAL HEALTH, VOL.24, NO.3, 1988, P.357-372 [AP-037314]
• REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY, VOL.6, NO.2, 1992, 183-184 [AP-053535]
• Prystowsky, S.D. et al., «Allergic contact hypersensitivity to nickel, neomycin, ethylenediamine and benzocaine. Relationships between age, sex, history of exposure and reactivity to standard patch tests and use tests in general population.» Archives of Dermatology. Vol. 115, p. 959-962. (1979). [AP-026448]
• Centre d'écologie et de toxicologie de l'industrie chimique européenne, Nickel and nickel compounds : review of toxicology and epidemiology with special reference to carcinogenesis. Technical report / ECETOC ; 33. Bruxelles : ECETOC. (1989).   http://www.ecetoc.org/publication/tr-033-nickel-and-nickel-compounds-review-of-toxicology-and-epidemiology-with-special-reference-to-carcinogenesis/
  http://www.ecetoc.org/technical-reports
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health et États-Unis. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Occupational health guidelines for chemical hazards. Vol. 1. Cincinnati : Centers for Disease Control. (1981-). DHSS-NIOSH 81-123. [RR-015002]   http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/81-123/
• Bayard, S., Health assessment document for nickel and nickel compounds. Final report., 1986 Microfiche : PB86-232212, EPA/600/8-83/012FF
• Guo, Y.L. et al., «Occupational hand dermatoses in hairdressers in Tainan City .» Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Vol. 51, p. 689-692. (1994). [AP-045896]
• Grattan, C.E.H. et al., «Cutting fluid dermatitis.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 20, p. 372-376. (1989). [AP-027055]
• Meding, B., Barregard, L. et Marcus, K., «Hand eczema in car mechanics.» Contact Dermatitis . Vol. 30, p. 129-134. (1994). [AP-044163]
• Christensen, O.B. et Möller, H., «Nickel allergy and hand eczema.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 1, p. 129-135. (1975). [AP-033202]
• Nilsson, E., «Contact sensitivity and urticaria in "wet" work.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 13, p. 321-328. (1985). [AP-011534]
• Zanca, A. et al., «The release of nickel from blackboard chalk may cause contact dermatitis.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 19, p. 143-158. (1988). [AP-020027]
• van Ketel, W.G., «Occupational contact with coins in nickel-allergic patients.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 12, p. 108. (1985). [AP-015439]

La cote entre [ ] provient de la banque Information SST du Centre de documentation de la CNESST.