WHMIS (Phenylmercuric acetate)

Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System

WHMIS 2015 classification - Note to reader
Update: 2015-12-11

  • Acute toxicity - oral - Category 21 2
  • Skin corrosion/irritation - Category 21 2 3 4
  • Serious eye damage/eye irritation - Category 23
  • Skin sensitization - Category 1B5 6 7 8 9 10 11
  • Reproductive toxicity - Category 28 12
    • Adverse effects on the development of the offspring
    • Toxic to the development
  • Specific target organ toxicity - repeated exposure - Category 18 12

  • WHMIS 2015 pictogram : Skull and crossbones

  • WHMIS 2015 pictogram : Exclamation mark

  • WHMIS 2015 pictogram : Health hazard

Danger

Fatal if swallowed (H300)
Causes skin irritation (H315)
Causes serious eye irritation (H319)
May cause allergic skin reaction (H317)
Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child (H361)
Causes damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure (H372)

Ingredient disclosure

Comments:

Due to the lack of data, classifications regarding eye irritation (H319) and skin sensitization (H317) were established by analogy to phenylmercury compounds.

Due to the lack of data, classification regarding toxic to reproduction (H361) was established by analogy to soluble inorganic mercury compounds (Mercury II chloride).

Due to the lack of data, classification regarding specific organ toxicity - repeated exposure (H372) was established by analogy to phenylmercuric acetate.

References

  • ▲1.  National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, RTECS (Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances). Hamilton (Ont) : Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety.   http://ccinfoweb.ccohs.ca/rtecs/search.html
  • ▲2.  Centre canadien d'hygiène et de sécurité au travail, CHEMINFO, Hamilton, Ont. : Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety   http://ccinfoweb.ccohs.ca/cheminfo/search.html
  • ▲3.  Grant, W.M. et Schuman, J.S., Toxicology of the eye : effects on the eyes and visual systems from chemicals, drugs, metals and minerals, plants, toxins and venoms; also, systemic side effects from eye medications. Vol. 2, 4éme éd. Springfield, ILL : Charles C. Thomas. (1993). [RM-515030]
  • ▲4.  Iden, D.L. et Schroeter, A.L., «The vehicle tray revisited : the use of the vehicle tray in assessing allergic contact dermatitis by a 24-hour application method.» Contact dermatitis. Vol. 3, no. 3, p. 122-126. (June 1977). [AP-000936]
  • ▲5.  Lombardi, P. et al., «Unusual occupational allergic contact dermatitis in a nurse.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 20, p. 302-303. (1989). [AP-039679]
  • ▲6.  Kanerva, L. et al., «Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from mercury.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 28, no. 1, p. 26-28. (1993). [AP-040058]
  • ▲7.  Rietschel,, R.L. et Fowler Jr., J.F., Fisher's contact dermatitis. 6ème. Hamilton (Ontario) : BC Decker Inc.. (2008). [RM-015084]
  • ▲8.  Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Toxicological profile for mercury. Atlanta [GA] : ATSDR. (1999).   http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp46.pdf
  • ▲9.  Mercury and Inorganic Mercury Compounds [MAK Value Documentations, 2001]. The MAK Collection for Occupational Health and Safety, Vol. 15. Allemagne : Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. (2012).   http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/3527600418.mb743997anoe0015/pdf
  • ▲10.  Özkaya E., «An Ususual Case of Mercurial Baboon Syndrome: Lasting Seasonal Attacks in a Retired Metalworker.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 58, p. 107-108. (2008).
  • ▲11.  Torresani C., Caprari E. et Manara G.C., «Contact Urticaria Syndrome due to Phenylmercuric Acetate.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 29, p. 282-283. (1993).
  • ▲12.  Lauwerys, R. et al., Toxicologie industrielle et intoxications professionnelles. 5ème éd. Issy-les-Moulineaux Cedex : Elsevier Masson SAS. (2007). [RM-514015]

The [number] refers to the Information SST database of the CNESST Documentation Center.