L'information disponible sur cette substance est partielle. Pour de plus amples renseignements, veuillez communiquer avec le Répertoire toxicologique.

Références

• ▲1.  Basketter, D.A. et Scholes, E.W., «Comparison of the local lymph node assay with the guinea-pig maximization test for the detection of a range of contact allergens.» Food and Chemical Toxicology. Vol. 30, no. 1, p. 65-69. (1992).
• ▲2.  Larsen, W.G., «Perfume dermatitis - a study of 20 patients.» Archives of Dermatology. Vol. 113, p. 623-626. (1977). [AP-024193]
• ▲3.  Gad, S.C. et al., «Development and validation of an alternative dermal sensitization test : the mouse er swelling test (MEST).» Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. Vol. 84, p. 93-114. (1986). [AP-019707 ]
• ▲4.  Basketter, D.A. et Gerberick, G.F., «An interlaboratory evaluation of the Buehler test for the identification and classification of skin sensitizers.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 35, no. 3, p. 146-151. (1996).
• ▲5.  Adams, R.M. et Maibach, H.I., «A five-year study of cosmetic reactions.» Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Vol. 13, no. 6, p. 1062-1069. (1985).
• ▲6.  Schnuch, A. et al., «Sensitization to 26 fragrances to be labelled according to current european regulation.» Contact Dermatitis. Vol. 57, p. 1-10. (2007).
• ▲7.  Larsen, W.G., «Perfume dermatitis.» Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Vol. 12, no. 1, part 1, p. 1-9. (1985). [AP-024810]
• ▲8.  Ford, R.A., Api, A.M. et Suskind, R.R., «Allergic contact sensitization potential of hydroxycitronellal in humans.» Food and Chemical Toxicology. Vol. 26, no. 11/12, p. 921-926. (1988).

La cote entre [ ] provient de la banque Information SST du Centre de documentation de la CNESST.